Anne Rice’s Break-Up with Christianity

In this post I want to explore Anne Rice’s recent ‘break up’ with Christianity, her faith, and whether her objections to the faith are valid.

The Reported Issue

Last week Rice declared on her Facebook page that:

“I quit being a Christian. I’m out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of …Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.”

Rice recommitted to the Roman Catholic Church in 1998 and she has openly described her decision to recommit to Christ.

‘In the moment of surrender, I let go of all the theological or social questions which had kept me from [God] for countless years. I simply let them go. There was the sense, profound and wordless, that if He knew everything I did not have to know everything, and that, in seeking to know everything, I’d been, all of my life, missing the entire point. No social paradox, no historic disaster, no hideous record of injustice or misery should keep me from Him. No question of Scriptural integrity, no torment over the fate of this or that atheist or gay friend, no worry for those condemned and ostracized by my church or any other church should stand between me and Him. The reason? It was magnificently simple: He knew how or why everything happened; He knew the disposition of every single soul. He wasn’t going to let anything happen by accident! Nobody was going to go to Hell by mistake. (Called Out of Darkness: A Spiritual Confession, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, ISBN 978-0-307-268-27-3, p. 183)

Despite her declaration that she could trust God to judge correctly Rice never came to accept a biblical position on a number of issues as an interview with the LA Times in 2005 revealed (I’m not including her position on birth control in this);

“Her views will not please all of the devout. Rice favors gay marriage. She believes the church position regarding birth control is a grievous error that is not supported by Scripture. She repudiates what she sees as intolerant, “sex-obsessed” church leaders, and says she does not find support in the message of Jesus for their focus on sexual orientation or abortion. She argues for a more inclusive church”

Rice herself said in the interview;

“He (Jesus) doesn’t say anything about abortion,” Rice said. “He doesn’t say anything about gays. I abhor abortion too. But to make Christianity rise and fall on these issues is a great distortion of Christ’s message.”

Her statement about making Christianity all about homosexuality and abortion is entirely valid. Christianity is certainly relevant to these issues and vice versa but they are not central points in themselves. The irony is that Rice appears to have distorted Christ’s message herself by making her own Christianity rise and fall on these very issues (as well as others). As she said in her own statement above ‘I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist.’

The Real Issue

If Rice’s issues simply rested with the church’s conduct then I could say that I empathise with her. The church has not always represented Christ well. I do believe that the biblical position on homosexuality is that it is outside of God’s plan for the gift of sex (Romans 1:24-32) and that the biblical position on abortion is that we have no right to presume when life begins and cannot therefore end it at our own convenience.  That said I do not support the crimes that others who hold these same beliefs have committed in the name of these values.

I would suggest, however, based on Rice’s own statements, that her problem goes beyond the church. In an interview with Joy Behar from HLN on CNN she speaks on whether she would join a church that had a gay minister or who were feminists. She says ‘That’s always been an option since the reformation, to find a group that more reflects what you hold to be the truth, or what you feel you have to hold onto….I prefer to walk away from the argument’

In her conversion to Christianity Rice declared that ‘no torment over the fate of this or that atheist or gay friend, no worry for those condemned and ostracized by my church or any other church should stand between me and Him.’

Anne Rice’s torment over the fate of her gay or atheist friend is a noble thing. It is a concern that all believers should share. However it is not justification for rejecting scripture and sound biblical doctrine.

Rice would have people believe that she is still committed to Christ while simply departing the church.

‘I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being “Christian” or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to “belong” to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group.’

However, what she is really committed to is a picture of Christ that she has created for herself that endorses the values she wants to hold. Ultimately instead of trusting in Christ to judge rightly according to the laws He has given, she has chosen to redefine right and wrong for herself and to stand in judgement of the church.

This is not an issue of trying to convince Rice to return to church. Some parts of the church, as in institution, are absolutely guilty of mistreating people on the grounds of sexual orientation, race, gender, and any manner of sins. There are other parts of the body of Christ who have stood for reconciliation between God and man and shown the love of Christ to all regardless of race, colour, gender or sexual orientation. Christ declared that he builds the church and it is clear that we as believers are to be part of it. (Matt 16:18)

The issue for Rice is that she has chosen a picture of Christ to believe in that is not the Jesus of the Bible. Christ died for the sake of homosexuals and abortionists and for religious, legalistic, arrogant fools. In seeking to protest against the discrimination of one group she has chosen to discriminate against the other and ultimately doomed both by denying the true Christ.

Let us pray she realises her mistake.

Advertisements

5 responses to “Anne Rice’s Break-Up with Christianity

  1. Soli Deo Gloria

    This is a good example of intellectual assent which is the mortal enemy of the re-birth which marks the entrance of God’s own children into His family and kingdom. There are so many things in life where we must confess that we don’t understand how or why they square up with our notions of what is right or fair. We are so full of opinions aren’t we? We like to think that even in the church we should all ‘have a say’ because we have imbibed the idea that this is the right and ‘Christian’ form of government. As the election looms, we should remember that. We like to think democracy is the fair and right (and Christian?) form of government, because we all get a say, so we ‘control’ who comes to power. The reality is that God appoints governors as He pleases regardless of the manner of their aparrently gaining power. It is equally true that He removes them at his pleasure. Life is not, as we are so inclined to think, about us and our opinions. It is about his glory, his pleasure, and his will. We are privileged to be called his friends, and to have some insight into his glory, pleasure, and will. Soli Deo Gloria.

  2. Hi James,

    Good write up on this Anne Rice character.

    The very, very sad fact of the matter is that she never was born-again. She has no saving faith in Jesus Christ & as you correctly mentioned “what she is really committed to is a picture of Christ that she has created for herself that endorses the values she wants to hold. Ultimately instead of trusting in Christ to judge rightly according to the laws He has given, she has chosen to redefine right and wrong for herself and to stand in judgement of the church.”

    It is sad and I hope she hears the gospel and does not reject it.

  3. as a church planter in Dallas, Texas I see this all the time. I’ve had people say they don’t go to church because “I’m a gentic researcher and the church is against science.” It’s not true, but some Christians do give off that sense of being anti-science.

    • Hi Brian, I live in Melbourne, am coming to Dallas in October to attend my son’s wedding in October. Maybe we can catch up over coffee.

  4. Thanks for the comments everyone. Whatever faith in Christ Rice professes to have she clearly has only picked and chosen the parts she wants to embrace. One wonders what the gospel was that was presented to her and what sort of discipleship that she has had. While salvation is ultimately the Lord’s we the church have a responsibility to teach the true gospel and inspire faith through the word, not spiritual platitudes or hopeful sentiments that aren’t based on scripture. I pray that the next gospel Rice hears is one that clearly communicates the truth of scripture and her true position before a just and holy God and what the true Christ has done to for us all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s